@shesek @donkeyscience It can be both moderation & censorship. If reddit can’t function without it, sounds like a flaw… ð@YoursNetworkork😉
IMO automatic removal w/o notifying the user is more insidious than moderation w/notification & explanation. https://t.co/KH2MZnY5Dh
@shesek Yeah, Reddit sucks in general.
@markcross @LukeDashjr @alistairmilne Hashrate signaling is unrelated to full node versions.
@mikestable Sounds like a job for… @grillmaestro!
@LarryBitcoin @socrates1024 Did I miss an /r/bitcoin rule somewhere that you’re not allowed to discuss /r/bitcoin policies?
@LarryBitcoin @socrates1024 After pointing out the ridiculous rule my comment was “unmoderated” and later the thread was locked & deleted.
@hernzzzzzz Control, no. Major discussion hub, yes.
@hernzzzzzz Slippery slope. What if someone advocates adding blacklisting at the node/protocol level? Cries of censorship would be stifled.
@eric_lombrozo @fluffyponyza Don’t shoot the messenger; @Melt_Dem noted this in her post: pic.twitter.com/f1PvfkH3cg
Confirmed: /r/bitcoin automoderator rules censor any references to censorship. https://t.co/m20OKO6SCX https://t.co/Q6CD1pd9Zh
@hitchslappy @LukeDashjr @alistairmilne Not all nodes can be connected to, often because they’re behind a NAT and only make outbound conns.
Configuration options available in Bitcoin Core…
0.5: 31
0.6: 48
0.7: 61
0.8: 64
0.9: 67
0.10: 97
0.11: 107
0.12: 129
0.13: 130
0.14: 139
lopp 8) My request to Bitcoin enthusiasts discussing proposals to improve the system is that you first ask yourself: “What would Hal do?”
lopp 1) I recommend that every Bitcoin enthusiast reads Satoshi’s original announcement email thread in its entirety: goo.gl/z3HkoK
64% of reachable Bitcoin nodes support Segregated Witness. https://t.co/QcOvlYKHBc H/T @LukeDashjr & @alistairmilne https://t.co/sZS3xB9ztf
@el33th4xor @DukeU @ncsu @UNC They’re listed on https://t.co/cv9j1hLACp