The below is an off-site archive of all tweets posted by @lopp ever

August 2015

ReutersTech Former Secret Service agent pleads guilty in Bitcoin theft reut.rs/1MYEEfk

via SocialFlow (retweeted on 7:46 PM, Aug 31st, 2015 via Twitter Web Client)

@jasonlk @desantis Don’t snapchat your bitcoins unless you like losing money!

via Twitter Web Client in reply to jasonlk

@JustusRanvier @kristovatlas We can only hope that they will bankrupt themselves while trying to do so.

via Twitter Web Client in reply to JustusRanvier

Claiming that new code must undergo a single group’s review process before being offered to the world: not permissionless innovation.

via Twitter Web Client in reply to lopp

Permissionless innovation: any developer can write code and offer it to the participants in the Bitcoin ecosystem, who adopt or ignore it.

via Twitter Web Client

“The governance of Bitcoin is whatever code that people are willing to run.” - @gavinandresen

via Twitter Web Client

@cypherdoc2 That logic could be extended to any of the consensus code. In the end, no one controls it because everyone controls it.

via Twitter Web Client in reply to cypherdoc2

Governance need not necessitate government.

via Twitter Web Client

Step back and marvel at the resources being expended to achieve consensus about changing this single line of code: https://t.co/sWGqFsDIaq

via Twitter Web Client

They’ll never find my bitcoins, as they are simultaneously everywhere and nowhere. https://t.co/AnsEksV5vp

via Twitter for Android

* Spend all day hunting down a bug in FOSS.
* Rejoice in finding bug and prepare to submit patch.
* Discover patch was submitted yesterday.

via Twitter Web Client

@desantis It’s only been a minor annoyance; not a big deal.

via Twitter Web Client in reply to desantis

@desantis It’s more of an intermittent rather than ongoing thing. Was slightly annoying last night flooding my home connection.

via Twitter Web Client in reply to desantis

Tell me I can’t discuss alternate implementions? I set up a new forum.
Attack my alternate implementation nodes? I spool up a few more.

via Twitter Web Client

Get busy learning or get busy dying.

via Twitter for Android

@masonic_tweets Not yet; was recently legalized in North Dakota.

via Twitter Web Client in reply to masonic_tweets

Currently taking bets on how long it will be before hackers take control of armed police drones and turn them against the operators.

via Twitter Web Client

@kristovatlas @alansilbert Sir, do you have a license to operate that computer?

via Twitter Web Client in reply to kristovatlas

@jgarzik It would be quite helpful to update the BIP with the logic behind the 20th percentile choice and its implications.

via Twitter Web Client in reply to jgarzik

@kristovatlas @alansilbert @MrHodl Maybe if we just give guns to our enemies, they’ll kill each other for us ;-)

via Twitter Web Client in reply to kristovatlas

@kristovatlas @alansilbert There also a “freedom vs safety” debate floating around here somewhere…

via Twitter Web Client in reply to kristovatlas

@alansilbert Perhaps we should be asking why Switzerland, which has extremely high gun ownership rates, doesn’t have same problems.

via Twitter Web Client in reply to alansilbert

@alansilbert Very hard to compare US to other countries when there are so many variables; can’t really have a control group to isolate them.

via Twitter Web Client in reply to lopp

jgarzik @lopp gmaxwell & blockstream recommendation

via Twitter Web Client (retweeted on 10:39 AM, Aug 28th, 2015 via Twitter Web Client)

@alansilbert I think such debates should differentiate between rational and irrational actors, though.

via Twitter Web Client in reply to lopp

@alansilbert It was meant to be ridiculous; IMO the root problems are psychological and sociological.

via Twitter Web Client in reply to alansilbert

@alansilbert If the problem is ease of mass destruction, I guess we should have stricter regulation on pressure cookers too…

via Twitter Web Client in reply to alansilbert

@alansilbert Firearm vs bladed weapons vs blunt weapons. You might be surprised by how many people are murdered with hammers.

via Twitter Web Client in reply to alansilbert

@alansilbert Of course more guns == more events happen w/guns. I wish such reports would do side-by-side with other weapons.

via Twitter Web Client in reply to alansilbert

Still scratching my head over why @jgarzik chose to use the 20th percentile of block size votes in BIP100 rather than median or mean.

via Twitter Web Client

@nanok How does @kncminer view block size hard caps? As more of a DoS protection feature or as a fee market enabler or something else?

via Twitter Web Client

@el33th4xor Taste the cryptorainbow.

via Twitter Web Client

@el33th4xor halvening == price doubling, obviously! lemme draw you some supply and demand curves…

via Twitter Web Client

Bitcoin Core contributors who feel that they have had pull requests unfairly rejected from Core should rebase and submit to XT.

via Twitter Web Client

Contributor to many Bitcoin FOSS projects, master of none.
✔ Bitcoin Core
✔ Bitcoin XT
✔ BitcoinJ
✔ Bitcoin-Box
✔ BitGoJS
✔ Copay
✔ Statoshi

via Twitter Web Client

“Future of Blockchain Tech” panel w/ @martindale, @shannonNullCode, @ajbeal, myself now available via @TheProtocolTV https://t.co/1zRn7kcbS5

via Twitter Web Client

@flyosity Let’s ban killing people while we’re at it!

via Twitter Web Client in reply to flyosity

@Satoshi_N_ Sick rhymes & references - I want to hear you and @realytcracker collaborate to rock blockchains together.

via Twitter Web Client in reply to Satoshi_N_

RT @Satoshi_N_: “Through the Wire” rough demo by @Satoshi_N_ https://t.co/hXtwYQGD6h Download it before it’s taken down!

via Twitter Web Client

@romansnitko @oleganza The incentive is trustlessness, which the average Joe doesn’t care about. This is OK; I think enough do care.

via Twitter for Android in reply to romansnitko

BitGo BitGo responds to customer demands by supporting increased block sizes. ow.ly/Rn16m

via Hootsuite (retweeted on 8:10 PM, Aug 25th, 2015 via Twitter for Android)

/r/Bitcoin moderators have implemented CSS to conceal their censorship and completely alter the meaning of comments. https://t.co/5QiXG1tS6A

via Twitter Web Client

RT @DanSpuller: NC Bitcoin Enthusiasts Rally for Better Cryptocurrency Legislation | @ExitEvent http://t.co/QKpP65paCV @rcsherwo @Bill_Warn…

via Twitter Web Client

@mikestable I don’t think that’s what pugs were designed for. RTFM!

via Twitter Web Client in reply to mikestable

@Satoshi_N_ Last I checked, @ButtCoin doesn’t even /have/ an exchange rate. Come back when you create something valuable.

via Twitter Web Client in reply to Satoshi_N_

@pierebel It’s unlikely because the median of miner votes would have to be to double the hard cap every 3 months.

via Twitter Web Client in reply to pierebel

“Multisig on steroids using tree signatures” via @pwuille https://t.co/oeL1XIvdwx

via Twitter Web Client

@pierebel Updating p2p code won’t cause a hard fork, though not updating your node would cause you to reject blocks > 32 MB.

via Twitter Web Client in reply to pierebel

@pierebel I believe further modifications would be required; BIP101 would give us 4 years to make the mods & test them.

via Twitter Web Client in reply to pierebel

BIP101: miners create fee market by setting individual soft caps and competing against other miners as hard cap grows to 8GB by 2036.

via Twitter Web Client in reply to lopp

BIP100: miners create fee market by voting on adjustable system-wide hard cap that maxes out at 32MB. Unlikely, but could reach 32MB in 1yr.

via Twitter Web Client

@01101O10 xtnodes.com is back and better than ever. Don’t forget xt.coin.dance; good luck taking them all down.

via Twitter Web Client in reply to 01101O10

@cinnamon_carter They were signing their Bitcoin Core blocks in support of 8MB; now they’ll switch to BIP101 blocks.

via Twitter Web Client in reply to cinnamon_carter

@maraoz @FaradamTimer Keep up the great work, Manuel!

via Twitter Web Client

RT @maraoz: Announcing http://t.co/Wm4G3c85VD - charge per minute for your on-demand services @FaradamTimer

via Twitter Web Client

itBit itBit stands with our peers in endorsing & Larger Block Sizes bit.ly/1ERPjBM pic.twitter.com/CXcYNAhKEu

via HubSpot (retweeted on 5:48 PM, Aug 24th, 2015 via Twitter Web Client)

reddit.com/r/bitcoinxt/ is uncensored. Our AutoMod approves shadowbanned users like @GamerAndy of @LetsTalkBitcoin pic.twitter.com/WmgJiNWaU8

via Twitter Web Client

Dogecoin devs planning a testnet stress test (1 MB block every minute) and will use a doge Statoshi node to monitor: https://t.co/RtzNhkWTqh

via Twitter Web Client

@jgarzik “…we will run code that supports this.” Which codebase is not so important.

via Twitter Web Client in reply to jgarzik

Kudos to @BitGo @BitnetTech @BitPay @blockchain @circlebits @kncminer @xapo for participating in meatspace consensus of BIP101.

via Twitter Web Client

RT @masonic_tweets: Major #Bitcoin companies sign pledge in support of BIP101 http://t.co/GrZ2oLLooy

via Twitter Web Client

Attackers have taken down http://t.co/gNzEODydC3 via DDoS, but can’t censor the data:

http://t.co/zOR4hJsZv8

https://t.co/J1fPGm7p0L

via Twitter Web Client

@ziggamon @girevikcap @1cyrilblanc1 @jonmatonis @qntra XT is, yes. Though personally I’m focused on block size. https://t.co/ZBJheR7jbv

via Twitter Web Client

@ziggamon @girevikcap @1cyrilblanc1 @jonmatonis @qntra I think you’ll find that XT will be the home of “controversial in core” PRs.

via Twitter Web Client in reply to ziggamon

RT @kristovatlas: The one and only @jeffreyatucker was kidnapped for a day for not having his papers in order. His account: https://t.co/dg…

via Twitter for Android

@jm111t @1cyrilblanc1 @jonmatonis @qntra The code is open source; sorry, but I don’t have time to walk you through it.

via Twitter Web Client in reply to jm111t

@1cyrilblanc1 @jonmatonis I don’t have enough respect for @qntra to dignify it with a formal response.

via Twitter Web Client in reply to 1cyrilblanc1

@datacreep No… BIP101 triggers off of block counts, not node counts.

via Twitter Web Client

2 weeks ago I made the first post on https://t.co/73QGG8pLJY. Today we passed 10,000 subscribers. https://t.co/qnKZtXXPIn

via Twitter Web Client

@1cyrilblanc1 @jm111t @jonmatonis @qntra “list could be served by malicious actors” - like the bitcoin node DNS seed lists? ;-)

via Twitter Web Client in reply to lopp

@1cyrilblanc1 @jm111t @jonmatonis @qntra “list could be served by malicious actors” not unless they compromise the SSL cert

via Twitter Web Client in reply to lopp

@1cyrilblanc1 @jm111t @jonmatonis @qntra False: “code prioritizes IP addresses of nodes known to behave correctly according to Mike Hearn”

via Twitter Web Client in reply to lopp

@1cyrilblanc1 @jm111t @jonmatonis @qntra Nor is there any “deanonymization” of XT nodes that run on Tor.

via Twitter Web Client in reply to lopp

@1cyrilblanc1 @jm111t @jonmatonis @qntra XT uses the same peer misbehavior logic as Core, just with additional Tor deprioritization.

via Twitter Web Client in reply to 1cyrilblanc1

@datacreep Nor do we know how many real Core nodes are running. It works both ways.

via Twitter Web Client

@jonmatonis Hateful rhetoric filled with inaccuracies and speculation. Standard @qntra post.

via Twitter Web Client in reply to jonmatonis

@dgenr818 Running a fleet of pseudonodes is neither good nor bad - makes no difference. People can spin it however they want; I report facts

via Twitter Web Client in reply to dgenr818

Looks like the XT node count surge is a Pseudonode operation: https://t.co/VJCBA7uKqZ

via Twitter Web Client

@zmanian It’s suspicious to say the least.

via Twitter Web Client in reply to zmanian

/Bitcoin XT:0.11.0/ is now the second most popular Bitcoin node useragent after today’s surge. getaddr.bitnodes.io/nodes/

via Twitter Web Client

@digitsu @ziggamon @Tone_LLT Right, it has great properties for a safe store of possibly valuable records, but protocol is value agnostic.

via Twitter for Android in reply to digitsu

@ziggamon @Tone_LLT @digitsu I’d go so far as saying Bitcoin aims to provide a store of ownership records, but the value is all market-based

via Twitter Web Client in reply to lopp

@ziggamon @Tone_LLT @digitsu Sure, safety from arbitrary govt devaluation is good, but does not in and of itself make a store of value.

via Twitter Web Client in reply to ziggamon

@Tone_LLT @ziggamon @digitsu Can you show me where the Bitcoin protocol (and its development) has had “store of value” as one of its goals?

via Twitter Web Client in reply to Tone_LLT

Livestream from @GenesisMining data center (switch to camera 2 for audio): lifeinsideabitcoinmine.com

via Twitter Web Client

Brainstorming ways to bust out of Reddit’s hierarchical moderator dictatorship system: https://t.co/FNO1UfB2ct

via Twitter Web Client

@LaurentMT meh; I doubt any of those commenters will be at @ScalingBitcoin ;-)

via Twitter Web Client in reply to LaurentMT

@aantonop @comcast My @TWC connection is getting 10X faster next month just because @googlefiber is about to arrive :-)

via Twitter Web Client in reply to aantonop

Many people are fearful for the future of Bitcoin, but I’m quite confident that @ScalingBitcoin consensus will be achieved in meatspace.

via Twitter Web Client

bendavenport Just booked my tickets to attend @ScalingBitcoin in Montreal Sep 12-13 on behalf of @BitGo.

via Twitter Web Client (retweeted on 5:52 PM, Aug 21st, 2015 via Twitter for Android)

“We are currently in the process of testing… we will most likely switch to BitcoinXT.” @GenesisMining http://t.co/PV2S4pBLY1

via Twitter Web Client

@cypherdoc2 This? Pretty sure he was referring to regtest networks, not testnet. Testnet would reject large blocks. https://t.co/u673Ljk2Og

via Twitter Web Client

Currently seeing about 10 transactions per second on testnet with a mempool size of 35,000 transactions. Is that you, Coinwallet.eu?

via Twitter Web Client

Whoa; someone is running a transaction stress test on testnet and filling all the blocks: blocktrail.com/tBTC/blocks/1

via Twitter Web Client

BitGo Developing multi-sig wallets now made easy with SDK release. ow.ly/RcihK

via Hootsuite (retweeted on 11:08 AM, Aug 21st, 2015 via Twitter Web Client)

@ziggamon Sure, plenty of people are opposed to a “benevolent dictator” model. But the “final call” is made by the rest of the ecosystem…

via Twitter Web Client in reply to ziggamon

@ziggamon Guess I misunderstood your position. So you don’t think XT could acquire governance of the protocol itself?

via Twitter Web Client in reply to ziggamon

@ziggamon If we agree that there is no governance then why do we disagree that XT could somehow acquire governance?

via Twitter Web Client in reply to ziggamon

@DigiEconomist If your neighbor has an improvement proposal that the ecosystem agrees with, it should be implemented.

via Twitter Web Client in reply to DigiEconomist

@DigiEconomist Yes; the free market is not about stability.

via Twitter Web Client in reply to DigiEconomist

@DigiEconomist “Trusted control” :-( Sorry, but I thought that’s exactly what we’re trying to avoid with Bitcoin.

via Twitter Web Client in reply to DigiEconomist

To be clear, the Bitcoin protocol is “governed” by the entire ecosystem of participants. If they choose Core to centrally manage, so be it.

via Twitter Web Client in reply to lopp

Disappointing to see people label Bitcoin XT a “coup.” That’s a centralized way of thinking that implies Core == governance of protocol.

via Twitter Web Client

@mikestable The highly endangered native Durham straightened weave.

via Twitter for Android in reply to mikestable

@mikestable Found some roadkill today in my neighborhood pic.twitter.com/vPiSe8ILdf

via Twitter for Android

@EdmundCMoy Agreed: “Bitcoin will still exist no matter what happens”

via Twitter Web Client in reply to EdmundCMoy

@MortuusBestia @sneakdotberlin @jonmatonis @robustus @oleganza Hear him out, maybe he knows how to fix that problem in humans.

via Twitter Web Client in reply to MortuusBestia

@jonmatonis @sneakdotberlin @robustus @oleganza *shrugs* you say “coup,” I say “competition in the marketplace of ideas.”

via Twitter Web Client in reply to jonmatonis

@jonmatonis @sneakdotberlin @robustus @oleganza IMO HODLing is the safest action in the event of a fork since your coins are on both chains.

via Twitter Web Client in reply to jonmatonis

@sneakdotberlin @robustus @oleganza It may very well fail to trigger. Though I seriously doubt it will be the last attempt at a fork, ever.

via Twitter Web Client in reply to sneakdotberlin

@sneakdotberlin @robustus @oleganza Seems like a “freedom vs safety” trade-off to me. You can’t stop people from trying in a free market.

via Twitter Web Client in reply to sneakdotberlin

@sneakdotberlin @robustus @oleganza I don’t see how that can be the case when anyone can fork the code and propose their own improvements.

via Twitter Web Client in reply to sneakdotberlin

@sneakdotberlin @robustus @oleganza No one holds a monopoly on development of the Bitcoin protocol; at best one can BDFL an implementation.

via Twitter Web Client in reply to sneakdotberlin

@robustus @sneakdotberlin @oleganza Yes, there’s even a config switch for it that requires no code changes: “disableippro”

via Twitter Web Client in reply to robustus

@muneeb It’s tricky because Bitcoin at its core is ideology - we’re just trying to represent it with computer code.

via Twitter Web Client in reply to muneeb

One interesting facet of the block size / fork debate is the revealing of which well respected developers resort to character assassination.

via Twitter Web Client

@oleganza To be clear, this doesn’t actually track both chains yet, right?

via Twitter Web Client in reply to oleganza

@oleganza If you’re vehemently against the resource prioritization code, you can disable it with the “disableippro” switch.

via Twitter Web Client in reply to oleganza

@sneakdotberlin @oleganza If you want to be accurate, link to the full code. It only executes if node is attacked. https://t.co/zbsXFxx7kS

via Twitter Web Client

@btcdrak Yes, thank you for contributing to proving my statement. Slush miners get to choose which block version to mine.

via Twitter Web Client

The power to arbitrarily regulate is also the power to sell exemptions from the harm resulting from said regulations.

via Twitter for Android

Someone needs a better fact checker. Slush is operating 2 pools; second BIP101 block is https://t.co/8WWdjQsooa https://t.co/awPqatGGEH

via Twitter Web Client

RT @spair: We support the adoption of BIP 101 for increasing #bitcoin’s #blocksize limit @BitPay https://t.co/4jrFQnQHPY

via Twitter Web Client

@Datavetaren *waves magic wand* LIGHTNING NETWORK - ALAKAZAAM!

via Twitter Web Client in reply to Datavetaren

…wonderfully wrong.
I lack a description.
I have no homepage.
I can’t hardly see you.
Yet somehow, i exist.

via Twitter Web Client (retweeted on 7:19 PM, Aug 19th, 2015 via Twitter for Android)

LetsTalkBitcoin Confessions of an /r/bitcoin moderator ow.ly/32WG0I

via Hootsuite (retweeted on 6:28 PM, Aug 19th, 2015 via Twitter for Android)

Datavetaren “Let’s talk about block size” datavetaren.se/?p=blocksize

via Twitter for Mac (retweeted on 4:06 PM, Aug 19th, 2015 via Twitter Web Client)

@jasonCwaite @rogerkver I have control; that’s how Reddit works. I choose not to abuse it.

via Twitter Web Client in reply to jasonCwaite

@rogerkver You’re welcome to join us at /r/bitcoinxt https://t.co/ESpBEnTNUz

via Twitter Web Client

ABC11_WTVD New poll shows Trump is still leading the GOP in NC, but surprise candidate ‘Deez Nuts’ is gaining momentum —> abc11.com/947054/

via TweetDeck (retweeted on 1:14 PM, Aug 19th, 2015 via Twitter Web Client)

WIRED The Bitcoin schism shows the genius of open source wrd.cm/1K5Uhkz

via SocialFlow (retweeted on 12:31 PM, Aug 19th, 2015 via Twitter for Android)

It looks like /r/bitcoin added 5 new mods in past 2 days; censorship takes a lot of manpower! https://t.co/wbMkqXm1pP

via Twitter Web Client

@mdotfallon Maybe; my understanding is that slush is currently operating two pools (one core & one XT) and hashers can switch between them.

via Twitter Web Client in reply to mdotfallon

@btcdrak @NickSzabo4 It was @gavinandresen who dumped all his coins on @bitfinex? Legendary!

via Twitter Web Client

@a_ferron @slush_pool @OctSkyward My own data only goes back two months, shows an average block size of 528KB https://t.co/djEbrM4xx0

via Twitter Web Client

@a_ferron @slush_pool @OctSkyward You’re making an argument off of one data point? https://t.co/k8TEgA5coB

via Twitter Web Client

It appears we have the first mined block with XT support via @slush_pool
Version: 536870919(10) = 0x20000007 (hex)
https://t.co/Jx7wyuqBJu

via Twitter Web Client

@rubensayshi Fee markets are good b/c confirming & storing txs has real-world costs. But no need to artificially constrain market.

via Twitter Web Client in reply to rubensayshi

Bring it on, CoinWallet. @BitGo is ready and waiting. http://t.co/lp9XiraN4p

via Twitter Web Client

@Datavetaren @jonmatonis @adam3us @fredwilson @cdixon LN and big blocks is not an either/or situation - we need both.

via Twitter Web Client in reply to Datavetaren

@Conspirosphere @cypherdoc2 Good news; your bitcoins will remain untouched. https://t.co/yEpi8bBs1N

via Twitter Web Client

@notbitcoinxt @adam3us There is no certainty of adoption at the protocol level; it must first be determined in meatspace.

via Twitter Web Client in reply to notbitcoinxt

@notbitcoinxt @adam3us Well then, since the conclusion is already foregone, we can all go back to normal!

via Twitter Web Client in reply to notbitcoinxt

@Conspirosphere @cypherdoc2 Um, do you believe in liberty or do you believe in treason?

via Twitter Web Client in reply to Conspirosphere

@adam3us Large miners who do so are only increasing the risk of a fork; they do so at their own peril.

via Twitter Web Client in reply to lopp

@adam3us Unlike running pseudonodes, miners who pretend to support XT-compatible large blocks but then reject them will be identifiable.

via Twitter Web Client in reply to adam3us

Bitcointalk & /r/bitcoin dictator-for-life Theymos apparently even considers BIP101 support to be “alt-coin support.” pic.twitter.com/xdtqt5UZAU

via Twitter Web Client

BitseedOrg Now available due to popular demand: Bitseed Bitcoin XT Edition bitseed.org/product/xt/ pic.twitter.com/pyrfVMnf3N

via TweetDeck (retweeted on 9:56 AM, Aug 18th, 2015 via Twitter Web Client)

At last! An initiative to prioritize improving Bitcoin’s privacy: https://t.co/DjsTD5dwNa /cc @obpp_org

via Twitter Web Client

@edmundedgar @el33th4xor Indeed, as usual the options are Voice or Exit.

via Twitter Web Client

@el33th4xor It sounds like they’re either jacked up automod or set all submissions to require approval.

via Twitter Web Client

@alansilbert Expect neither cleanliness nor efficiency; human consensus will never be as well oiled as machine consensus.

via Twitter Web Client in reply to alansilbert

@TonySwish @victoriavaneyk Where can we learn about the “Live-Action” token distribution?

via Twitter Web Client in reply to TonySwish

@alansilbert Trying to get a decentralized infrastructure to upgrade takes a long time, thus the long lead time from release to fork trigger

via Twitter Web Client in reply to alansilbert

@alansilbert Isn’t 5 months sufficient time to decide?

via Twitter Web Client in reply to alansilbert

brian_armstrong 3/ the longest chain is by def bitcoin, with a few months warning for when the election happens, users would not experience disruption

via Twitter for iPhone (retweeted on 12:06 PM, Aug 17th, 2015 via Twitter Web Client)

brian_armstrong 2/ the reality is more like an election, there is one clear winner, decided likely within a few hours, in bitcoin you vote on upgrades

via Twitter for iPhone (retweeted on 12:03 PM, Aug 17th, 2015 via Twitter Web Client)

brian_armstrong 1/ A lot of people might misunderstand a bitcoin “fork” as meaning two versions of bitcoin would exist indefinitely, which would be bad.

via Twitter for iPhone (retweeted on 12:03 PM, Aug 17th, 2015 via Twitter Web Client)

@ciscoguru @tylerwinklevoss @OctSkyward Nope; perceived XT node count doesn’t affect the fork, only miners. And miners aren’t anonymous.

via Twitter Web Client in reply to ciscoguru

@Jeremy_DeGroot @pig_poetry @Bronto I think it should be obvious that the set of stickers with motorcycle & firearm companies were mine :-)

via Twitter Web Client in reply to Jeremy_DeGroot

The honest thing to do would be to rename /r/bitcoin to /r/bitcoincore - mods seem to be confusing protocol with implementation of protocol.

via Twitter Web Client

@codedlogic @jonmatonis From a technical standpoint it certainly can happen. Every aspect of the protocol is up for debate.

via Twitter Web Client in reply to codedlogic

@enjoybitcoins Sorry to hear that; you’re welcome to join us on /r/bitcoinxt

via Twitter Web Client in reply to enjoybitcoins

enjoybitcoins @lopp We got banned today. Haven’t broke a rule, and bust our ass to promote Bitcoin. Too bad.

via Twitter Web Client (retweeted on 9:26 PM, Aug 16th, 2015 via Twitter Web Client)

@kristovatlas He’s protecting us from our wrong ideas.

via Twitter Web Client in reply to kristovatlas

“If 90% of /r/Bitcoin users find these policies to be intolerable, then I want these 90% of /r/Bitcoin users to leave.” Theymos

via Twitter Web Client

The banhammer is now out in full force on /r/bitcoin - /r/bitcoinxt subscribers have doubled in past 24 hours. https://t.co/92iS0hIrCr

via Twitter Web Client

@1cyrilblanc1 Sure, though professional developers judge each proposal by its merits, not by the history of the person making it.

via Twitter Web Client in reply to 1cyrilblanc1

@1cyrilblanc1 *shrugs* the cost is the effort of convincing everyone of the merit of your proposal and, if successful, the risk of forking.

via Twitter Web Client in reply to 1cyrilblanc1

@1cyrilblanc1 @MrHodl That’s up to each individual. As for myself, I’ll continue my work as a Bitcoin software engineer. Status quo.

via Twitter Web Client in reply to 1cyrilblanc1

@MrHodl Whatever you want. I run a fork of Bitcoin Core I call “Statoshi.” But guess what - it’s actually Bitcoin!

via Twitter Web Client in reply to MrHodl

There’s more tweets in this month! Go up and select a date to see more ↑