Was excited to see many new faces at a local Bitcoin meetup today, but then they promised to double my bitcoins in… https://t.co/eO1Zwo5kwD
Payment channel-based networks are coming to Bitcoin. Miners only get to decide if developers do it the easy way or the hard way.
@LaurentMT @sysmannet @khannib @BitFuryGroup @BitfuryGeorge @valeryvavilov The issue is that Bitfury is the only on… https://t.co/95F7xZgc0y
@sysmannet @khannib @BitFuryGroup @BitfuryGeorge @valeryvavilov It sounds like you could help them be much more eff… https://t.co/QS37Mtor2W
@codeCrypto Depends on the fee estimate algorithm. It won’t screw up Core’s.
@khannib @BitFuryGroup Excellent. @BitfuryGeorge, @valeryvavilov, @sysmannet, if you know the entity behind these t… https://t.co/C2NSDfc8Zv
RT @khannib: @lopp @BitFuryGroup It’s more an inefficient use of Bitcoin than a spam attack, see https://t.co/L2LpvIzfvO
.@BitFuryGroup 3) Possible reason: fee payments are being made off-chain, thus making it impossible for blockchain… https://t.co/Ahnpn5ncY7
2) The only way to say if a txn is “spam” is if it pays an appropriate fee. 25 sat/b isn’t competitive, so why is @BitFuryGroup mining them?
1) Folks are saying this address is generating “spam” txns. It is creating 25 satoshi/byte txns that get confirmed. https://t.co/4bBHemqhZs
@orweinberger *shrugs* seems like a waste trying to determine. Either txns pay appropriate fees or don’t. Looks lik… https://t.co/kgiWmxAoli