@JaEsf @olivierjanss Probably not impossible; some thoughts here from @SDLerner https://t.co/lql7LDpUJ9
@JaEsf @olivierjanss Slight problem in that there’s no way (yet) for someone to prove that they are running a full node.
Rumor has it that the team who rehashes the most arguments wins the fork of their choice via Proof of Jerk. https://t.co/YsHKLl5DdI
@bhec39 Purchase is linked to my identity; item could be intercepted and tampered with.
@olivierjanss More thoughts on the costs and benefits of running a full node: https://t.co/4XYdmZr0mW
@olivierjanss Why should users run full nodes? Doing so provides them w/a security model that has fewer assumptions: https://t.co/2DKbJOkOTx
RT @bradheath: Federal judge says “the public interest is … well served” by keeping the FBI’s Tor exploit secret, for reasons that are al…
Wanted to buy a new computer for #CyberMonday but then the paranoia kicked in and I remembered it would be poor OPSEC to do so online…
@prestonjbyrne If you have sufficient hashrate and create enough txns to raise the fee rate floor for confirmations, I’d bet it could be.
@jbeardsley Bitcoin Black Friday was a big deal the past 2 years, though notsomuch this year.
Today’s uptick in mempool size appears to be due to several megabytes worth of transactions paying half the going f… https://t.co/SxnRUtLic6
@alansilbert Mostly normal though there were some spikes on the 24th https://t.co/4KdVguaWfk
A breakdown of the transaction fee rates that were paid during the mempool backlog last week.… https://t.co/Imcqd0rMmv
RT @jerrybrito: The Secret, Dangerous World of Venezuelan Bitcoin Mining https://t.co/9MlNDCOujR